Jon Wood's Bad Wasabi: Art-o-stration

RSS

Posts tagged with "social justice"

biohacks:

Patriarchy, matriarchy…

Society is made up of two genders. Both of them equally affect and make up society. This is why both genders have issues and oppression.

But blaming “the patriarchy” for all of society’s issues is [nonsense]. We have women in politics. We have men in politics. We have women who act as the head of their household. We have men who act as the head of their household. Both genders influence society.

Blaming one gender for society’s problems doesn’t fix anything. Neither does saying only one gender has problems.

People have problems, and we should fix them regardless of gender.image

Tumblr Dictionary

johncory9mm:

Appropriation (AKA Cultural Appropriation): A white person doing or wearing something that hurts the feelings of a PoC.

Feminism: A philosophy in which women bear no responsibility for their behavior, and men are not only responsible for their own behavior, but are also responsible for the behavior of women.

Male: (See Rapist)

Racist: A person who happened to be born white.

Rapist: A person who happened to be born male.

Social Justice Warrior (SJW): People who use hate, intolerance and insults in order to promote tolerance and acceptance for all lifestyles

White People: (See Racist)

I love how all the SJ people can do is mock it without actually disproving it.

JC, you forgot “rape culture”. Also known as “patriarchy”.

May 7

(Source: theantistatist)

May 5

anonguy11:

heroinfriday:

reversedescrimination:

“So did you know (x amount) of dogs are abused every year? We need to stop this!”

“Um, I know you’re fighting for the safety of all animals, but you mostly just talk about dogs and cats get abused too, so maybe we could include actions that will help raise awareness about them as well…?”

“OMG SHUT UP STOP TRYING TO SILENCE DOG ABUSE WITH YOUR STUPID MADE UP CAT-ABUSE FACTS ALL YOU CAT LOVERS ARE JUST REALLY DOG HATERS BESIDES ALL CATS ARE LAZY SELFISH PRICKS WHILE DOGS ARE AWESOME AND SMART WHY DO CATS GET ALL THESE GIFS AND ARE SEEN AS CUTE WHEN DOGS OBVIOUSLY DESERVE THEM MORE”


What exclusive feminist discussions look like to me.

^^ Pretty [cuddling] accurate!

-Liv

Brilliant

May 1

Men in power (in democracies)

just-smith:

  • Did not get appointed to this station by the evil brotherhood of men.
  • Were voted in legitimately by the electorate, at least half of which are women.
  • Are therefore every bit as much a result of female sexism as male sexism.
  • “Men should lead” is just another gender role, us expecting men to behave in the way the gender binary says they should. It’s men’s purpose to lead, to fight, to work, just as much as it’s women’s purpose to bear and raise children.
  • Men have suffered from these expectations as much as women have. Being forced into either role isn’t fun.
  • Men in power aren’t therefore the sole result of male misogyny, but the combined consequence of men and women enforcing the gender binary.
  • If we had to vote for people to do stereotypically “women’s work”, and only elected women, that would just be us all enforcing the binary.
  • Having to vote for people to do stereotypically “men’s work”, and only elected men, is just be us all enforcing the binary.
  • The evil brotherhood does not exist.

Incidentally, women are the largest voting bloc in America, and were heavily responsible for electing Obama. Twice.

jlandrith:

mattreadsthings:

antiantifeminist:

yes good

YES GOOD MORE OF THIS
MORE ADS ACKNOWLEDGING MALE VICTIMS OF RAPE.

Finally, a consent PSA that goes both ways.  As a male rape survivor of a female rapist, I’m glad to see this progress.  There are a LOT of women who just don’t get it.  Not all men want all sex all the time from all women.  Why is this so f***ing hard????

jlandrith:

mattreadsthings:

antiantifeminist:

yes good

YES GOOD MORE OF THIS

MORE ADS ACKNOWLEDGING MALE VICTIMS OF RAPE.

Finally, a consent PSA that goes both ways.  As a male rape survivor of a female rapist, I’m glad to see this progress.  There are a LOT of women who just don’t get it.  Not all men want all sex all the time from all women.  Why is this so f***ing hard????

(Source: armenianqueen)

I am just really bothered by the argument

petite-coulson:

lyzzoftheeast:

“it’s MY sons penis, it’s MY decision”

You don’t see the issue here? It is HIS penis, not your penis.

I detest the ignorant notion that the foreskin is a birth defect, and it’s inherently unsanitary.

Someone TOLD you that, they did not TEACH you that. Teaching implies that it was factual information.

I know I go on the occasional rant about it here, and I don’t even have a penis, but I cannot stand the misinformation.

An uncircumcised penis is no more complicated to clean than a vagina.

A foreskin is not some random piece of skin, it’s part of the penis. Actually PART of it. It’s not extra skin, it’s not WITH the penis, it is penile skin.

Thank you and good day.

I feel like people might understand this better if it were explained to them in graphic terms.

Bascially

when the doc performs a circ, they pretty much have to

a) rip back the foreskin off of the head of the penis—usually with some sort of clamping device—since it doesn’t actually retract until around puberty. The foreskin is very completely attached to the penis. Which totally destroys that whole “I have it done so that he can be clean” argument because nothing. can. get. in. there. 

and

b) cut off a part of someone’s highly sensitive anatomy (note: “anatomy” not “birth defect”) without their consent and, not to mention, a complete disregard for their well-being. Have you ever heard a baby while they’re having that done? They sound like they’re having their fingernails ripped off. Except it’s their foreskin.

and finally

c) stick that fresh, open wound that takes weeks (probably around 4-6 weeks) to heal, in that fucking lovely enviroment called “The Diaper” with pee and poop. Ahh. So fresh and so clean clean. 

Now, I don’t have a penis. But I am a Health Science/Health Education major, so I do recognize archaic, savage practices when I see it. So let’s at least attempt to exercise a little restraint, hell, maybe even do a little research *before* you decide to maim your kid.

image

(Source: intheblooms)

Wait a second.
How did the meerkat learn to write?

Wait a second.

How did the meerkat learn to write?

(Source: williamshakesqueer)

sosungalittleclodofclay:

vondell-swain:

it’s not even that people on this website are gullible it’s that tumblr as a whole somehow completely lacks the normal adult human skill of thinking briefly about information after you read it to make sure it makes any sense

behavior is communicable and people imitate each other for greater social cohesion.
news at 11.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asch_conformity_experiments

(Source: itsvondell)

why are you so threatened by feminism? this is specifically re: your "why i'm a male feminist" post. i'm actually curious.

I’m not. I’m highly critical of it. I think feminism has done a lot of good for women. I think it’s also done and is doing a lot of screwing over of men. All in the name of “equality”.

I know several feminists who actually care about and work toward helping men’s issues as well, and most of them are also critical of mainstream, gynocentric feminism. In fact, some feminists are critical of the way feminism helps women, such as largely ignoring female rapists. In fact, feminists in India recently successfully kept the gov’t from making rape laws gender-neutral. The response from Western feminists - the same ones declaring India a “rape culture” - was pretty much nonexistent.

There has also been a trend, recently, to claim that feminism also helps men. Given that the movement has spent most of its focusing almost exclusively on women as victims and men (in the form of “the Patriarchy”) as perpetrators, the idea that that same rhetoric is adequate to address men’s issues is…dubious, at best. Every single attempt I’ve seen to “integrate” men’s issues into mainstream feminism has been logically suspect, most often the idea that men’s issues are just a “side effect” of women’s oppression.

When the first lady can say women are the primary victims of war because their feelings are hurt and they’re inconvenienced by their male loved ones dying without being called on it, something’s gone wrong. When the president can say girls whupping boys in schools is a “great accomplishment” in Newsweek and no one bats an eye, something’s wrong.

Did you actually mean to address this post to PON?

http://permutationofninjas.tumblr.com/post/21546757093/the-following-day-i-attended-a-workshop-about