Jon Wood's Bad Wasabi: Art-o-stration

RSS

Posts tagged with "fail"

Let me get this straight;

Your Generic Male Protagonist’s house is being fumigated. He decides this means he has to take the cat to work with him.

His work at the highly restricted chemical lab which doesn’t allow pets.

He must’ve known that his house was going to be fumigated for an extended period, yet there are no nearby kennels, and he has no real friends. Except, of course, for his friend and co-worker, who has two cats of her own.

Why doesn’t he ask her? He’s shy.

So he puts the cat in the utility closet, and she’s accidentally released when GMP’s boss comes looking for him with a pink slip. That’s reasonable. What is somewhat let reasonable is that the cat is able to see multiple people, none of which notice the orange cat hanging around, and then the cat manages to knock over several dangerous chemicals and start a major fire.

GMP rushes to see to it, and not only does the lab not have any sort of fire procedure or tools or exit, the nearest fire extinguisher outside the room is in a sealed glass box that has no way to open it. Our zero has to punch the glass case open. It’s not even safety glass, and he cuts himself. And what does he need it for? To crack the glass door to the lab, of course, because if there’s some kind of button for exiting in the event of an emergency, it’s not working. At all.

Right, that’s my suspension of disbelief utterly wrecked, and at about three pages in. Good job.

The problem with trying to consense social justice issues into a few panels is that social justice issues are always, always complex. Sure, it’s easy to mock idiots on toy forums, but I can’t recall any time Shortpacked has tackled social justice that didn’t fail in some way. 
The implication that concerns about sexism against the two genders should be boxed off into their little areas. Feminists also see fit to discuss racism and other areas, under the idea of “intersectionality”. But if someone wants to bring up how the current issue affects men in any way other than positive, they are usually greeted with a sneering accusation of trying to make it “all about the menz”. They are also automatically assumed to be male.
The idea that certain types of misandry and prejudice against men aren’t “real” concerns compared to more serious concerns. Try telling a feminist that she shouldn’t be worried about prejudice against women in commercials because women are victim-blamed for their own rapes. Are the two equal in “seriousness”? No. how many people are actually claiming that they are?
Discussion of these issues is not a zero-sum game. You can discuss sexism against men without “mansplaining” or “derailing” discussions of men against women. Again, intersectionality doesn’t seem to include misandry, or prejudice against white or straight people and so on.There was an article I read about how straight white men generally have it better. One guy commented to talk about how he is discriminated against for being a white man. He has chronic illness, but not visibly, and as a straight white guy there’s no funds to help pay for his medicine. He was even told, to his face, that he couldn’t get a job he was qualified for because he was not a minority. Several people flamed him for trying to downplay racism against minorities, despite him explicitly saying that his point was ‘And’ not ‘Or’. One particularly loathsome specimen literally said it was impossible for white people to be discriminated against. I linked him to Reginald Denny on Wikipedia, and he never responded. He also said that the original guy could ask any minority, and they would disagree with him. I responded that I was a minority and I agreed with him, and he promptly tried to come up with some BS about how my opinion suddenly didn’t count.
Men don’t have some sort of monopoly on attempting to redirect discussions of prejudice against the other gender. This lovely post on feministing involves several feminists ignoring a discussion about the presumption of guilt against men, especially in rape cases, unless they had someone to talk about the “other side” of the issue how it relates to feminism. Apparently just discussing that men are falsely accused and assumed to be guilty is “victim-blaming” and “anti-feminist”. The blogger and several others even seem to think that the organizers had some sort of responsibility to hear the other side. This was not a blog post, mind. This was a real-world seminar with actual people speaking which the blogger made up her mind about before even attending. What’s the definition of “prejudice” again?

The problem with trying to consense social justice issues into a few panels is that social justice issues are always, always complex. Sure, it’s easy to mock idiots on toy forums, but I can’t recall any time Shortpacked has tackled social justice that didn’t fail in some way. 

  1. The implication that concerns about sexism against the two genders should be boxed off into their little areas. Feminists also see fit to discuss racism and other areas, under the idea of “intersectionality”. But if someone wants to bring up how the current issue affects men in any way other than positive, they are usually greeted with a sneering accusation of trying to make it “all about the menz”. They are also automatically assumed to be male.
  2. The idea that certain types of misandry and prejudice against men aren’t “real” concerns compared to more serious concerns. Try telling a feminist that she shouldn’t be worried about prejudice against women in commercials because women are victim-blamed for their own rapes. Are the two equal in “seriousness”? No. how many people are actually claiming that they are?
  3. Discussion of these issues is not a zero-sum game. You can discuss sexism against men without “mansplaining” or “derailing” discussions of men against women. Again, intersectionality doesn’t seem to include misandry, or prejudice against white or straight people and so on.

    There was an article I read about how straight white men generally have it better. One guy commented to talk about how he is discriminated against for being a white man. He has chronic illness, but not visibly, and as a straight white guy there’s no funds to help pay for his medicine. He was even told, to his face, that he couldn’t get a job he was qualified for because he was not a minority. Several people flamed him for trying to downplay racism against minorities, despite him explicitly saying that his point was ‘And’ not ‘Or’. One particularly loathsome specimen literally said it was impossible for white people to be discriminated against. I linked him to Reginald Denny on Wikipedia, and he never responded. He also said that the original guy could ask any minority, and they would disagree with him. I responded that I was a minority and I agreed with him, and he promptly tried to come up with some BS about how my opinion suddenly didn’t count.
  4. Men don’t have some sort of monopoly on attempting to redirect discussions of prejudice against the other gender. This lovely post on feministing involves several feminists ignoring a discussion about the presumption of guilt against men, especially in rape cases, unless they had someone to talk about the “other side” of the issue how it relates to feminism. Apparently just discussing that men are falsely accused and assumed to be guilty is “victim-blaming” and “anti-feminist”. The blogger and several others even seem to think that the organizers had some sort of responsibility to hear the other side. 

    This was not a blog post, mind. This was a real-world seminar with actual people speaking which the blogger made up her mind about before even attending. What’s the definition of “prejudice” again?
You know that feeling when you spend hours on a piece then suddenly realize it looks horrible and you hate it?

You know that feeling when you spend hours on a piece then suddenly realize it looks horrible and you hate it?

Juliet Whiskey Fail 005 by ~u63r
I’ve had this unfinished for two months now, and recent events have…made it unlikely I’ll find the motivation to.OH WELL.Status: “It’s Complicated” -> “Single”

Juliet Whiskey Fail 005 by ~u63r

I’ve had this unfinished for two months now, and recent events have…made it unlikely I’ll find the motivation to.

OH WELL.

Status: “It’s Complicated” -> “Single”

this is of KatersOneSeven
who blogs for us 24/7
I am not a caricaturist
//Autodesk Sketchbook Pro

this is of KatersOneSeven

who blogs for us 24/7

I am not a caricaturist

//Autodesk Sketchbook Pro