“you should be thankful someone actually wanted to steal your artwork”
I note that very few people who say this have ever accomplished any creative work requiring significant effort.
“you should be thankful someone actually wanted to steal your artwork”
I note that very few people who say this have ever accomplished any creative work requiring significant effort.
What’s supposed to happen
What’s happening when you don’t credit
What you’re making them do
Every artist grow by displaying their work and getting critique. But when their work is spread around without any credit to the artist, AND EVEN MAKES THE OWN ARTIST DELETE IT FROM HIS/HER SITE it lost the purpose and meaning.
so true
Every creator who has ever posted their original hard work on the net will understand.
Defending ownership of our work does not make us ungrateful, greedy or mean. Most creators depend on credit and exposure to get work, our stuff is not a free clipart gallery.
Take the time to find the source of things you like.
BRAVO!!!!
Never,” said Kareen with passion, “ever suggest they don’t have to pay you. What they pay for, they’ll value. What they get for free, they’ll take for granted, and then demand as a right. Hold them up for all the market will bear.
-
A Civil Campaign, Lois McMaster Bujold
One mistake many newbie artists make is to take jobs on spec. Sometimes some guy says he’ll pay you if what he’s doing is a success. One, this is a bad idea, since, as Kareen says, it devalues your work. Two, if you absolutely must, make sure to get a contract. Yes, even if the client is your mother. Actually, especially if they’re related or a good pal, since family and friends tend to assume they have more leeway.
The Internet.
In the comments, John Su pointed out that this works as both the moment of the crime or the moment the guy realizes that someone ripped him off.
#9gag
This, I think, can be applied to art or writing or frankly any of the other creative pursuits–perhaps the point is not necessarily that you create the most brilliant work the world has ever seen, but simply that you create the works that only you can create.
Certainly it’s the reason I stopped reading cookie-cutter fantasy…there are so many books that it seems anybody could have written, given Generic Fantasy Template #8 and a can of spray-glitter. But I’ll still lay out money for hardcovers from any number of writers, flawed and angry or grim and frustrating as they occasionally are–Sheri Tepper, Robin Hobb, Stephen Grundy, I’m lookin’ in your direction!–because for better or worse, they’re the only ones that can write those books, and you know when you’ve finished who you just read.
I’ve often said that you can only do what you can do–usually when the dog has crapped on the floor and the cat is throwing up and the toilet is overflowing and all of my bras are currently in the dryer and somebody wants to know why I have not done X in my copious spare time–but I had not previously framed it in my head as “and you should only do what you can do.”
And of course this could be a bit of a trap, as one obsesses neurotically about one’s own originality and finding one’s voice and all these sources of creative panic, but then came the follow-up question–”So how do you find that original voice?”
And here is where Collins uttered the second great truth, which is one that I actually knew, because artists say it to each other all the time, and occasionally we even listen to ourselves when we talk.
When we talk about finding ones voice, or pursuing one’s original vision or any of the other obtuse verbage you hang about the question of “What do I sound like?” and “What story am I telling?” and “How do I say this so anyone cares?”, it sounds remarkably self-involved, as if you go into deep meditation and navel gazing and sink a bore-hole into some personal creative well and possibly the serpent Kundalini rises up your spine bearing a small, exquisitely monogrammed invitation from your creative self.
Of course, this is a load of crap.
Originality is not something you get from within. You actually beg, borrow and steal it, generally from other people, frequently motivated by being gnawingly jealous of how much better they are than you.*
If you’re a poet, says Collins, you read all the poets on the shelf and I would extend it to say that if you’re an artist, you look at as much other art as you can cram in your eyeballs and if you’re a writer you read. A lot.
Then you shove every influence into a blender and hit puree.
The point is not that you are the only cook who has ever used these ingredients, it is that nobody has ever combined them quite like you. “What is that?” they say, sampling your stew, “I can’t quite place the flavor…” and of course it’ s the saffron you nicked from Rumi and the splash of brandy from Georgette Heyer and Lovecraft’s cryptic and ill-omened root vegetable and the single perfect quail egg you swiped from one of Basho’s poems. “How original!” they say, right before the laudanum from Sir Arthur Conan Doyle takes effect and then you go through their pockets and drag them out of the room by the heels.
- (via eccentric-nucleus)
(Source: ursulav.livejournal.com)
This has been my night.
gpoy
>2013
>Using separate sketch and lineart layers
>using layer thumbnails
Plebians.
308/#b365: Cupcake Girl Take 1
My original concept involved Cupcake Girl pulling up a sort of bustier or bodice. Then I checked out the Jack Wills Handbook the previous renters of my house neglected to stop delivery on, and got the idea for a kind of off-the-shoulder 80s sweater tube thingy. Kinda like this.
They don’t prosecute people for opening others’ junk mail, do they?